Close

Not a member yet? Register now and get started.

lock and key

Sign in to your account.

Account Login

Forgot your password?

Brussels Forum Papers 2011

2012 Brussels Forum Papers will be posted in advance of the 2012 Brussels Forum.

The below papers are from the 2011 Brussels Forum.

The EU’s External Action Service: Will it Deliver?

by Peter Chase

Click here for summary

The European External Action Service (EEAS), set up on January 1, 2011, will help the European Union create a coherent and effective external policy by bringing together the EU’s “soft” trade and aid policy tools and its member statedriven foreign policy. EEAS Chief Catherine Ashton builds on a growing member state ethos of cooperating on foreign policy issues, but legal limits, the need for unanimity and institutional difficulties will constrain her. Combining parts of the Commission, Council Secretariat, and member state diplomats into the EEAS raises cultural and professional issues only time can resolve, while the Commission and the Council Secretariat will need to supplement the steps they’ve taken to adapt to the new institutional reality and ensure the policy coherence the EU desires. An increasingly assertive European Parliament enlivens the policy debate. The global community needs a more effective EU on the world stage, and should help nurture the EEAS, rather than criticize it prematurely.

Rival Visions of Transatlantic Energy Security

by Thomas Legge

Click here for summary

The policy debate on energy security in Europe and the United States is preoccupied with the priority of securing supplies of foreign oil and gas and reducing dependence on their imports. This has led to a geostrategic “great game” as rival powers attempt to assert control over finite supplies. But recent technological developments offer new ways to improve energy security. The effectively unlimited resources of renewable energy — solar, wind, water, and biomass in North Africa, south Asia, and other strategically important areas — could provide alternative sources of energy to reduce competition for natural gas and coal (and oil, if this were accompanied by electrification of transport). Massive transport of electrons, rather than hydrocarbon molecules, across 21st-century supergrids could achieve the same energy security objectives with a host of other possible gains as a bonus, from economic development in sensitive regions of the world to reduced risk of climate change and increased competitiveness of renewable energy. Improved energy management in urban areas, industrial facilities as well as in the existing generation, distribution, and transportation of electricity have the potential to contribute to a sustainable energy system.

Convoy Unraveled: Why U.S. and European Post-Crisis Economic Policies Differ (And What to do About It)

By Jean Pisani-Ferry

Click here for summary

After a coordinated initial response to the global financial crisis in 2008-09, the coordination between the major economies of the EU and the United States has since unraveled. In 2010, policy divergences between the United States and Europe have emerged and they have come to dominate the international discussion on macroeconomic policy priorities.

As often, several competing explanations are on offer. One emphasizes differentiated economic and financial structures as the origin of the dissimilar impacts of a common shock. Another view stresses differences in the policy setup arising from institutional constraints, especially though not only, as a result of the EU’s particular policy set-up. A third one puts the onus on doctrine and ideology, and how that causes different perceptions of the policy challenges and risks faced by policymakers.

This paper proposes five measures that the EU and United States could take together to help regain some form of economic coordination despite these obstacles.

New Institutions for a New World: The Transatlantic Alliance and the Future of the Global Economic Order

by David Post and Pierce O’Reilly

Click here for summary

Political disagreements, the financial crisis, and the emergence of new powers have called both the economic dominance and the political relevance of the transatlantic alliance into question. Given these existing challenges and expected longerterm shifts in economic power, there has been much debate about how the transatlantic alliance can best ensure the future longevity of a Western-led international economic system. The conventional wisdom is that socializing rising powers into existing international norms and institutions will be the most important determinant of the stability of the existing liberal economic order. Though this approach has many benefits, in and of itself, this strategy is fundamentally incomplete. In order to cement its central position in the global economy, the alliance needs to draw on its tradition of institutional innovation to strengthen transatlantic competitiveness and define the economic rules of the game for the 21st century.

 

Deep Cuts: What the Age of Austerity Means for Global Public Goods

by Bruce Stokes

Click here for summary

The provision of global public goods — for the common defense, the economic development of the world’s poorest societies, and the mitigation of and adaptation to climate change — is at risk as governments in Europe and the United States try to rein in their spending to cope with the mounting public debts incurred during the Great Recession. Such fiscal austerity threatens the longterm security, humanitarian, and environmental interests of nations on both sides of the Atlantic. Looming austerity will require defense cooperation heretofore not seen in peace time. Greater cooperation in research and development, production, and procurement of defense technologies would be a logical move for cash-strapped NATO allies. Foreign aid is likely to be another casualty of fiscal belt-tightening. A pooling of American and European aid funding at the country or regional level may be necessary to cope with limited resources. Climate finance needed for adaptation to and mitigation of climate change is similarly at risk. New and innovative sources of financing are desperately needed. It is time for a transatlantic dialogue on the implications of fiscal austerity for global public goods.

Why Principles — and not Players — Should Determine the Nature of the Emerging International Order

by Dhruva Jaishankar and Joshua W. Walker

Click here for summary

The remarkable global growth story of the past two decades is already beginning to manifest itself geopolitically. The arrival of new global powers presents the West with a dilemma: whether to prioritize players or principles in creating a new international architecture that contributes to the continuity and efficacy of international norms. If the West fails to do either, there is every likelihood that a competing global system may emerge with ruinous consequences for all. Truly empowering new players will require sacrificing privileges, reaffirming principles, consolidating space, and privileging and engaging emerging democracies